Some questions I'm pondering from our conversation ...
Why do people here only consider adoption after they tried ages to have a baby naturally or through IVF?
Why would it be better for a dually heritage child to be placed with a couple with one person who is dual heritage (even if they are not of the same heritage as he child and potentially different sides of the world) rather than a white couple?
Why is it looked down upon to have a child that it not the same color as you?
Why do people think you are strange or a "better person" if you would consider adopting as a first choice rather than a last resort?
Why would you put a Christian couple at the bottom of the stack because of your own bad experience with religion?
I am passionate about adoption. The adoption culture here is unexplainable and I struggle to articulate my thoughts about it clearly.
Rightfully so, there is a big push on matching a child's identity as closely as possible. But at the end of the day, the child is being given a new identity with new parents because there was something about their biological parent's identity that was not meeting the child's need (in the cases I deal with at least). Shouldn't we trust the new parents to shape the child's identity and provide them an understanding of their birth identity - even if the couple does not reflect that identity ....
This new guy was sent to sort out the adoption crisis in England.
Here is a link about the changing law for mixed race adoption that I found.
I do hope and pray there is change in the adoption mindset the future...
No comments:
Post a Comment